1996 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus (230 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Cirrus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Cirrus | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Cirrus | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
