1996 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus.
Because 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Cirrus | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Cirrus | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3270 mm |
