1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 750 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Grand Voyager | RM A |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2870 mm |
