1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1953 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 850 kg more than 1953 Simca Aronde.
Because 1953 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1953 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Chrysler | Simca |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Aronde |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |
