1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 475 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chrysler | Riley |
Model | Grand Voyager | RM A |
Year Released | 1996 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2870 mm |