1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2500 mm |
