1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (175 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 875 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | Grand Voyager | Munga |
Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2010 mm |