1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (157 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (275 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | Grand Voyager | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2550 mm |
