1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 90 kg more than 1992 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1992 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Grand Voyager | Cougar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1860 mm |