1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 1998 Honda SSM is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (262 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1998 Honda SSM | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Grand Voyager | SSM |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |