1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 865 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Grand Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2770 mm |