1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (275 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | HRT |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 275 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |