1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (157 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Grand Voyager | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2390 mm |
