1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (175 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 534 kg more than 2001 Volvo Hatric.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (307 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo Hatric. (280 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo Hatric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Hatric |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3778 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 307 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2800 mm |
