1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 330 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (271 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (262 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Voyager | Alero |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2720 mm |