1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Volvo V40
To start off, 2004 Volvo V40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V40 (169 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (157 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 520 kg more than 2004 Volvo V40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (275 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo V40. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo V40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Grand Voyager | V40 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2570 mm |
