1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2005 Marcos TSO is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Marcos TSO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Marcos TSO | |
Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
Model | Grand Voyager | TSO |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |