1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 392 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Grand Voyager | CSX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |