1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (157 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Grand Voyager | Pixo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2360 mm |