1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet

To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (175 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.

Because 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
Make Chrysler Aston Martin
Model Grand Voyager Cygnet
Year Released 1996 2011
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3778 cc 1300 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 99 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic CVT


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]