1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
