1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2013 Mini Roadster

To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 605 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager (275 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Roadster has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2013 Mini Roadster
Make Chrysler Mini
Model Grand Voyager Roadster
Year Released 1996 2013
Body Type Minivan Roadster
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 157 HP 0 HP
Engine RPM 4700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 275 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Vehicle Weight 1800 kg 1195 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 3728 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1892 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2467 mm