1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (163 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 854 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Sebring | 1957 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Seat |
| Model | Sebring | 600 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 19 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |
