1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 650 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chrysler | DAF |
Model | Sebring | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |