1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1972 Holden Torana

To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 380 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.

Compare all specifications: