1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1978 Zastava 750

To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (163 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 750. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 787 kg more than 1978 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: