1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 334 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Sebring | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Maserati |
| Model | Sebring | Bi Turbo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 183 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |
