1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1996 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Sebring | 240 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |