1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72

To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.

Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1996 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 1996 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: