1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2000 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (163 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 284 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chrysler Sebring 2000 Mazda 626
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Sebring 626
Year Released 1996 2000
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 100 HP
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1429 kg 1145 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2620 mm