1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2003 Marcos TS500

To start off, 2003 Marcos TS500 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Marcos TS500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Marcos TS500 (321 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Marcos TS500 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 285 kg more than 2003 Marcos TS500.

Because 2003 Marcos TS500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Marcos TS500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Marcos TS500 (475 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2003 Marcos TS500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Sebring.

Compare all specifications: