1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (152 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Sebring | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |