1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 203 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Sebring | Sable |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |