1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 310 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sebring | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
