1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (163 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 84 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Sebring | Matrix |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 123 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |