1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Sebring (163 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (149 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1427 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 149 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 78.7 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |