1996 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-V (182 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 70 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Sebring | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Sebring | CR-V |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 182 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 99 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1429 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1644 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |