1996 Chrysler Viper vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Viper (389 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Viper | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Viper | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7986 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 389 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5150 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 620 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3060 mm |
