1996 Chrysler Viper vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Viper (389 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Viper | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Viper | UTE |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 620 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |