1996 Chrysler Viper vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1996 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Viper (389 HP) has 179 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1996 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado. 2011 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1996 Chrysler Viper has manual transmission. 1996 Chrysler Viper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chrysler Viper | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Viper | Colorado |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 620 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |