1996 Citroen Berlingo vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Berlingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Berlingo would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Berlingo. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Berlingo.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen Berlingo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 584 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Berlingo. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Berlingo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen Berlingo | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
| Model | Berlingo | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Panel Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1749 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2891 mm |
