1996 Citroen C 15 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Citroen C 15 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1996 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1996 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen C 15 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | C 15 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |