1996 Citroen C 15 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Citroen C 15 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen C 15.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen C 15 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C 15 | 66 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |