1996 Citroen C 15 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1996 Citroen C 15 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1996 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen C 15.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen C 15 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C 15 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4690 mm |