1996 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1996 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 620 kg more than 1996 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen C 15.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Citroen C 15 2009 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C 15 3
Year Released 1996 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 954 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 44 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 845 kg 1465 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 55 L