1996 Citroen Rally Raid vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen Rally Raid. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen Rally Raid would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Rally Raid. (297 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Rally Raid. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 420 kg more than 1996 Citroen Rally Raid. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen Rally Raid (590 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XJ. (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen Rally Raid will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Rally Raid | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | Rally Raid | XJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3157 mm |