1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1996 Citroen Saxo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen Saxo (74 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Citroen Saxo weights approximately 175 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen Saxo (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen Saxo | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | Saxo | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 26 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |
