1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 1969 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1996 Citroen Saxo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen Saxo (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1969 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1969 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1969 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Citroen Saxo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1969 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Saxo | 1969 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Saxo | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2060 mm |