1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1996 Citroen Saxo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 616 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen Saxo. (95 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Citroen Saxo | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Saxo | 616 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2480 mm |