1996 Citroen Saxo vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1996 Citroen Saxo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Citroen Saxo (74 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 42 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Citroen Saxo (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Citroen Saxo | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | Saxo | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 63 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 882 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2460 mm |
